Friday, May 25, 2012

DOMA Ruled Unconstitutional By Federal Judge, Yet Again

Location: California, USA

Post image for Breaking: DOMA Ruled Unconstitutional By Federal Judge, Yet Again

Full Story » The New Civil Right Movement

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken, a federal judge in Oakland, California, late Thursday struck down as unconstitutional a provision of DOMA, the federal Defense of Marriage Act. This is the second federal judge to rule the same segment of DOMA unconstitutional and at least the fifth federal case to find the 1996 law unconstitutional. President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have also declared the law — which bans same-sex couples from receiving legal federal recognition of their unions, about 1100 benefits afforded automatically to heterosexual couples, and defines marriage as one man, one woman — unconstitutional, and are refusing to defend it in court.

There's more...

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Democrats rush money to Wisconsin for Walker recall

Location: Wisconsin, USA

Full Story » Gay Today

Democratic governors pledged $1 million on Thursday to pay for Wisconsin television advertisements in a final push to recall Republican Governor Scott Walker, who has a small but consistent lead in polls before the June 5 vote.

Walker faces a special election after he angered Democrats and labor unions by pushing through the state legislature a law that strips public sector labor unions of much of their power.

Walker critics gathered nearly a million signatures to force the vote, and Democrats picked Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett to run against him in the recall vote.

But every public poll released since Barrett was chosen on May 8 has shown Walker in the lead, with the margin ranging from 4 to 12 points. Polls also show an extraordinarily small number of undecided voters.

Wisconsin media reported earlier this month that local Democrats were angry with the national party for failing to provide enough money to compete with Walker, who has raised some $13 million this year from conservatives nationwide.


There's more...

Wednesday, May 23, 2012



Full Story » New Now Next

Jim Parsons homosexuality has never been much of a secret, but the actor was just officially “outed” so to speak in a New York Times article. At one point the author writes about the actor, currently starring in the Broadway production of Harvey and set to soon start filming The Normal Heart: “The Normal Heart resonated with [Parsons] on a few levels: Mr. Parsons is gay and in a 10-year relationship, and working with an ensemble again onstage was like nourishment, he said.”

Again, no real surprise, but the casual mention buried in the story shows how comfortable the actor, most well-known for his role on The Big Bang Theory, clearly is with his sexuality.
There's more...

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Court: Gay student may wear ‘Jesus is not a homophobe’ t-shirt to school

Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA


Full Story » LGBTQ Nation

CINCINNATI, Ohio — An openly gay Ohio teen who sued his high school after being threatened with suspension for wearing a t-shirt containing the message “Jesus is not a Homophobe,” will be allowed to wear the shirt to school whenever he chooses.

The clerk’s office for U.S. District Court Judge Michael R. Barrett announced Monday that Maverick Couch, 16, and the Wayne Local School District, have agreed to allowed Maverick to wear the t-shirt without restriction.

The agreement also specifies that the school district must pay $20,000 in damages and court costs.

The suit stems from an April 2011 incident at Waynesville High School, when Maverick wore a t-shirt with a rainbow Ichthys, or “sign of the fish,” and a slogan that says “Jesus Is Not a Homophobe” in observation of the National Day of Silence.

According to the suit, principal Randy Gebhardt called Maverick into his office and instructed him to turn the T-shirt inside out; Maverick complied.

But over the summer, Maverick further researched his First Amendment rights, and when school resumed in the fall of 2011, he approached the school principal seeking permission to wear the T-shirt. Gebhardt restated that he would be suspended if he wore the shirt.

There's more...

Monday, May 21, 2012

Dharun Ravi Sentenced To 30 Days In Jail


Dharun Ravi

Full Story » Huffington Post

Dharun Ravi was sentenced to 30 days in jail as part of a probationary sentence today for spying on his college roommate with a webcam and writing about what he saw on Twitter.

New Jersey Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman could have given the ex-Rutgers University student up to 10 years for the most serious charges related to the cyber-bullying of his gay roommate Tyler Clementi in September 2010. He was ordered to report to Middlesex County Jail on May 31.

But giving Ravi, 20, the most severe punishment seemed unwarranted even to Middlesex County prosecutors who filed papers saying he didn't deserve the maximum possible sentence, even though he "shows no remorse."


There's more plus video...

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Massachusetts celebrates eight-year anniversary of the freedom to marry

Location: Massachusetts, USA


Full Story » Freedom to Marry

Today marks the eight-year anniversary of the first marriages between same-sex couples in Massachusetts, the first state in our country to embrace the freedom to marry.

In November 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that there is no rational, legal basis to deny a marriage license to same-sex couples, and on May 17, 2004, same-sex couples began to be issued marriage licenses.

Since the first weddings took place eight years ago, 18,462 same-sex couples have wed in the state, according to MassEquality, the statewide advocacy organization that pushed hard for the freedom to marry. Freedom to Marry's own National Campaign Director, Marc Solomon, served as Executive Director for MassEquality when the state passed the freedom to marry.

The current Executive Director of MassEquality, Kara Suffredini, issued a statement yesterday about the anniversary:
Just eight years ago, in 2004, when Massachusetts first began honoring the marriages of same-sex couples, the issue of marriage equality was cynically exploited by the national GOP for political gain. Today, seven national polls have found that Americans explicitly support the rights of same-sex couples to marry and the days of maligning the marriages of same-sex couples to scare voters are fast ending.

That all this has occurred in less than a decade speaks to the power of the honest conversation that is taking place across America as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender residents come out to their friends, family, and neighbors. We are extremely proud that the movement for marriage equality saw its first victory in Massachusetts, where 18,462 same-sex couples have wed since May 17, 2004. In the eight years that same-sex couples have been marrying in Massachusetts, we have learned that our communities are safer, happier, and healthier when all families are respected, supported and celebrated. As time goes on and even larger majorities of Americans come to support marriage equality, we look forward to the day when all Americans can enjoy the freedom to marry.
There's more...

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Anderson Cooper to Appear on Jeopardy's 'Power Player Week'


Anderson Cooper to Appear on Jeopardy's 'Power Player Week'

Full Story » People.com

He's a silver-haired CNN anchor who recently got his own talk show. Who is Anderson Cooper?

The giggling newsman is going to be on Jeopardy for the game show's "Power Players Week."

Cooper, who is one of 15 celebrity contestants to appear on "America's Favorite Quiz Show" beginning Monday, is hoping to win $50,000 for the charity of his choice, The Trevor Project.

There's more...

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Bush Pollster: GOP Must Evolve On Gay Rights


Bush Pollster: GOP Must Evolve On Gay Rights

Full Story » Talking Points Memo

Republicans must evolve on gay rights or risk political extinction, a top GOP pollster warns leading establishment figures in a revealing new memo.

Jan van Lohuizen, who polled for President George W. Bush in 2004, finds that support for gay rights — including same sex marriage — is rising at an accelerated pace among members of all political affiliations. He calls on Republicans to acknowledge the shift in the way they talk about the issue.

The memo, reported by various news outlets, recommends that Republicans express their support for “equality under the law as a fundamental principle” because “freedom means freedom for everyone.”

Remarkably, Lohuizen advises Republicans to re-frame gay rights as a conservative value.

“As people who promote personal responsibility, family values, commitment and stability, and emphasize freedom and limited government we have to recognize that freedom means freedom for everyone,” he advises Republicans to say. “This includes the freedom to decide how you live and to enter into relationships of your choosing, the freedom to live without excessive interference of the regulatory force of government.”

Since President Obama announced his support for same sex marriage last Wednesday, Republicans and conservative media have criticized him for political opportunism. But party leaders have shown little interest in making a big issue of it.
There's more...

Thursday, May 10, 2012

World reacts to Obama’s 'evolution' on same-sex marriage

Full Story » Gay News Network

Pressure has heaped on Prime Minister Julia Gillard following US President Barack Obama’s decision to air his personal support for same-sex marriage during a television news interview overnight.

During the course of the interview with the US ABC network, Obama made it clear his views had well and truly moved from “evolving” to outright support on the issue.

“Today, I was asked a direct question and gave a direct answer: I believe that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry,” Obama said in a statement following the televised interview.

“Even at my own dinner table, when I look at [my daughters] Sasha and Malia, who have friends whose parents are same-sex couples, I know it wouldn’t dawn on them that their friends’ parents should be treated differently.

“I respect the beliefs of others, and the right of religious institutions to act in accordance with their own doctrines. But I believe that in the eyes of the law, all Americans should be treated equally. And where states enact same-sex marriage, no federal act should invalidate them,” he added.

“If you agree, you can stand up with me here.”

In Australia, soon-to-be-retiring former Greens leader Senator Bob Brown said Obama’s support following a period of reflection on the issue would perhaps prompt local politicians to follow suit.

“It opens the way for Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce, who are still cornered by the old thinking, to move ahead themselves and catch up with the majority of Australians who feel that equal marriage is where we should be going as a nation,” the openly gay politician told ABC Radio.

According to statements made by the Prime Minister today, despite Obama’s personal evolution on the issue Gillard’s opinion seems not to have budged.

“I know President Obama has made that statement,” Gillard told ABC Radio when asked about the news this morning.

“I haven’t had the opportunity to view it myself. I’ve seen the reports of it, but no, my view hasn’t changed and when a bill comes to the parliament later this year ... I won’t vote for it.
“I’ve made my position clear and that’s the position I’ll take into the parliament when ultimately the Bill that has been moved by Stephen Jones, one of the Labor members of our team, comes before the parliament.”

Gillard remains out of step with other Western leaders on the issue with UK Prime Minister David Cameron and newly installed French President Francois Hollande both committing their personal support to equality in recent days.

Obama's announcement was met with immediate and widespread praise by LGBT rights advocates in the US.

“President Obama’s ‘evolution’ is now complete. Congratulations, Mr. President, for making history today by becoming the first sitting president to explicitly support marriage for same-sex couples,” director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Rea Carey said.

The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) president Herndon Graddick said Obama’s support would be judged positively by history.
“The arc of history today bent a little closer to equality for every American,” he said.

Founder and President of Freedom to Marry, Evan Wolfson, said Obama was now only one of many who believed in equal rights for same-sex couples.

“Today, President Obama added his voice to the growing chorus of Americans who believe that all loving and committed couples should share equally in the freedom to marry,” he said.

Regular Fox News commentator Sally Kohn also backed Obama’s decision.

“I’m glad the president's views have finally evolved enough to catch up with equality and justice, but given the political sensitivities of this topic and the polarized times in which we find ourselves, I’d rather he make a much more full-throated and bold speech on marriage equality — not because gay activists pressured him, not because the media dogged him, but because it’s the right thing to do,” she wrote.

Legendary actor and vocal gay rights advocate George Takei said he was “thrilled” by the news.

“I commend the President for taking what many pundits inevitably will say was an ‘unnecessary’ risk in an election year,” he said.

“Such an assessment, however, sadly only underscores the second-class status many LGBT Americans experience daily, knowing that their rights and lives are nothing more than a political tool to be hauled out to rally the base, for or against.”

Other celebrities took to Twitter to voice their reactions.

“Obama gets it right on gay marriage. Bravo,” Alec Baldwin said over the social networking site.

“Bravo, Mr. President, and thank you,” out actor Neil Patrick Harris tweeted.

“Thank you, President Obama! ... No more living in the past!” reality tv star Kim Kardashian tweeted.

Openly gay Glee star Jane Lynch could not hide her excitement as well.

“Pretty darn happy today,” she tweeted. “Thanks Mr President, for supporting the dignity of my family and so many others!”

Obama’s change of mind on the issue came about only a day after a New York Times editorial urged the president to make a clear statement on the issue following US Vice President Joe Biden’s impromptu announcement of support during a live television interview last weekend.

There's more...

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Obama Backs Gay Marriage



Obama Gay Marriage

Full Story » Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- In a nod to a dramatic shift in public opinion, Barack Obama on Wednesday became the first sitting president to announce his support for same-sex marriage.

In a sit-down interview with ABC's Robin Roberts, Obama completed what has been a markedly long and oft-mocked evolution on the matter.

"I've always been adamant that gay and lesbian Americans should be treated fairly and equally," Obama told Roberts, in an interview that will air in full on ABC's "Good Morning America" Thursday.

(Watch ABC's entire clip below)

"I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married," he said.

The statement constitutes an act of political bravery on the president's behalf, as well as a major victory for the gay rights community, which has been pushing him to declare his support for marriage equality for several years. With the issue back in the news this week, the pressure intensified.

On Sunday, Vice President Joseph Biden told NBC's "Meet The Press" that he was personally comfortable with same-sex marriage, which was followed the next day by Education Secretary Arne Duncan saying the same.

The White House insisted that there was no daylight between the vice president's position and the president's, noting that Biden clarified his statement as being in reference to civil rights for gay couples. But the explanation was largely dismissed by both supporters and critics as a convenient way for the president to signal support for marriage equality without having to declare it himself.

There's more, see the video...

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Anti-gay constitutional amendment passes in North Carolina

Location: North Carolina, USA


Full Story »  Freedom to Marry

Disappointing news out of North Carolina tonight. We just learned the discriminatory Amendment 1, which adds an amendment to the state's constitution banning all marriage, civil union, or domestic partnership for same-sex couples, passed today. State law already prohibits the freedom to marry for same-sex couples.

Our Founder and President Evan Wolfson released the following statement moments ago:


“As momentum for the freedom to marry continues to grow in the rest of the nation, today’s vote is a painful reminder of what happens when a preemptive ballot-measure is stampeded through before people have had enough time to take in real conversations about who gay families are and why marriage matters to them. This amendment is a last gasp of discrimination that will cause real harm to families, communities, and businesses in North Carolina, but says little about the prospects for a better outcome in battles to come in states where there has been greater visibility for loving and committed couples and those who get to know them. And even in North Carolina, the long-term effect of this nasty attack will be to spur more conversations and open more hearts, helping more people rise to fairness and support for the freedom to marry.”


North Carolina's legislature narrowly passed the sweeping anti-gay constitutional amendment last September. Proponents of the anti-gay measure snuck it on the May ballot, at a time when they knew there would be low voter turnout and a more favorable mix of voters on their side.

But nevertheless, we know that this amendment will be short lived. As more Americans actively engage in discussion around why marriage matters for same-sex couples, support for the freedom to marry is growing every day around the country, including North Carolina. Even Republican House Speaker Thom Tillis - one of the leading supporters of Amendment 1 - predicted, when speaking to college students at North Carolina State, that the amendment "will be repealed within 20 years."

There's more...

Monday, May 7, 2012

My Family Was Harassed at the North Carolina Polls

Location: North Carolina, USA


Full Story » Huffington Post

On May 4 my partner and I took our two boys with us to vote early against North Carolina's Amendment 1. We expected to peacefully fulfill our civic duty before my partner headed off to work and I figured out what to do all day with a sickly but energetic 3-year-old and his ever-more-independent baby brother.

We were not prepared at all for the drama that we encountered as we approached the early voting location. A crowd of people stood along the path that we needed to walk down to enter the building. From their signs and the way that they all quietly stared at us as we made our way across the parking lot, it was clear that these people were campaigning. I got the sense that the crowd was lying in wait, that as soon as we were close enough to pounce upon, we would be pounced upon.

My partner held our 3-year-old's hand as we walked, and I hugged our 1-year-old, who was snug against me in a front carrier. Surely, these people wouldn't be ugly to us in front of our children. My heart raced as I scanned for friendly faces or messages. I could see signs both for and against the amendment, as well as individual candidate paraphernalia. As we moved within speaking distance, a woman feebly called out the name of her candidate, and asked if we would vote for him. We barely had time to respond before the rest of the group erupted with their messages.

I was so overcome with the cacophony and the pounding of my own blood in my ears that I didn't catch a lot of what was being said. I did hear, "Vote for marriage!" and my partner say something back like, "This is our family. We're here to vote to protect our family."

Two young men were there campaigning against the amendment, one of whom wore a homemade anti-amendment sandwich board. I smiled at him and managed to say, "Thank you for being here to support us." The other anti-amendment campaigner called out to us over the mayhem in a sing-song tone to "vote agaaainst this prejudicial amendmennnnnt!" His silly but kind expression of support helped to briefly calm my racing heart. I pumped my fist in the air and replied, "That's what we're here for!"


There's more...